Application Security
Shift-left controls, SAST/DAST/IAST, supply chain checks, and policy-as-code mapped to OWASP SAMM & NIST SSDF. CI/CD native.
SBAR
Situation: Rapid release cycles introduce injection, authz, and supply chain risks.
Background: Mixed maturity across services; limited policy-as-code; ad-hoc scanning.
Assessment: Gaps in SAMM (Design/Implementation/Verification), missing gates in CI/CD.
Recommendation: Implement SAST/DAST/IAST gates, Semgrep CI, SBOM attestation, and risk SLAs; map to SAMM & SSDF.
AI & Agentic Security
Prompt-injection defenses, model gateway guardrails, red-team patterns, LLM app hardening, and AIBOM governance.
SBAR
Situation: LLM apps exposed to prompt injection, data exfiltration, and tool abuse.
Background: Early-stage guardrails; limited red-team simulations.
Assessment: Inadequate input/output validation, weak secrets/data controls, low observability.
Recommendation: Add gateway guardrails, jailbreak filters, agent policy sandboxing, and red-team runbooks; capture AIBOM.
Consultancy & Resourcing
On-demand AppSec architects, threat modeling, risk registers, and program rollout (metrics, KRIs, governance).
SBAR
Situation: Programs stall without AppSec ownership and measurable KPIs.
Background: Security debt grows; dev velocity pressured.
Assessment: No unified risk register; unclear KRIs; scattered ownership.
Recommendation: AppSec PMO, risk register, quarterly OKRs, and shared scorecards; embed AppSec architects.
Secure Code Training & Code Review
Role-based secure coding labs, deep PR reviews, and Semgrep rule packs tuned to your stacks and defect profile.
SBAR
Situation: Recurrent defects (XSS, authZ, SSRF) in PRs.
Background: One-off training not tied to PR outcomes.
Assessment: High MTTR on app vulns; weak secure patterns.
Recommendation: High-frequency micro-labs + PR guardrails (Semgrep packs), reviewer playbooks, and golden patterns.
CIS Cybersecurity Audit
CIS Controls readiness, gap analysis, prioritized remediation, and exec dashboards aligned to business risk.
SBAR
Situation: Controls drift and audit fatigue.
Background: Multi-cloud growth without central policy enforcement.
Assessment: Coverage gaps in inventory, logging, and identity hardening.
Recommendation: CIS 18 gap closure plan, policy-as-code, dashboards, and continuous evidence collection.
Vulnerability Management
Asset intelligence, EPSS/KEV-aware triage, SLA workflows, and auto-ticketing into your ITSM.
SBAR
Situation: Backlogs obscure exploitable risk.
Background: Ticket noise; no risk-based routing.
Assessment: Low signal triage; no EPSS/KEV weighting; SLAs bypassed.
Recommendation: Risk-based VM with EPSS/KEV, asset criticality, ownership mapping, and auto-ITSM.
IAST & RASP
Runtime instrumentation, exploit prevention, and continuous verification in pre-prod and prod.
SBAR
Situation: RCE/logic bugs surface only in prod incidents.
Background: Limited runtime visibility.
Assessment: Gaps in pre-prod verification and live exploit prevention.
Recommendation: Instrument critical apps with IAST & RASP; enforce blocking mode on crown jewels.
Security Pentesting
Web/Mobile/Cloud/IoT/OT & AI pentests, adversary emulation, dev-ready findings with re-test verification.
SBAR
Situation: Annual tests miss sprint-introduced flaws.
Background: Point-in-time scope; slow retests.
Assessment: Gaps across web/mobile/cloud/AI paths; low fix verification.
Recommendation: Move to PTaaS with sprint-aligned scopes, replayable findings, and timeboxed retests.